ATP Challenger Tour Β· Round of 32 Β· Helsinki
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Gombos
πͺ Counterpuncher
Fatic
πͺ Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
Both Norbert Gombos and Nerman Fatic are πͺ Counterpuncher types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 4,672 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Gombos | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8β9 | 9β4 |
| Avg odds | 2.15 | 2.01 |
| ROI % | -29.4% | +26.5% |
| Units P/L | -5.00u | +3.44u |
Prior meetings and scores Β· 1 career meeting
1
Gombos
0
Fatic
Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months
Fatic has a higher win rate against shared opponents (67% vs Gombos's 33%).
| Opponent | Gombos | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Thiago Seyboth Wild | L 36 76 16 | W 57 75 64 |
| Carlo Alberto Caniato | W 76 76 | W 36 63 63 |
| Hugo Grenier | L 67 16 | L 36 46 |
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Gombos | Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57% | 63.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 75.2% | 68.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.9% | 53.4% |
| Aces / Match | 4.5 | 3.4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.1 | 1.6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 54.4% | 48.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 32.3% | 34.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48.4% | 54.1% |
| BP Converted % | 42.8% | 41% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 17.3 | 21 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 30.9 | 26.3 |
| Net Pts Won % | 55.1% | 71.5% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.9% | 51.9% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Norbert Gombos and Nerman Fatic face off in the Round of 32 at Helsinki on Hard.
Norbert Gombos leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Norbert Gombos is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Dalibor Svrcina (Jun 17).
Nerman Fatic is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kyrian Jacquet (May 24).
Share this match