ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Bratislava
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Gombos
🪃 Counterpuncher
Stebe
🛡️ The Spoiler
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 57% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 1,775 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Norbert Gombos here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Gombos | Stebe |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–9 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.15 | - |
| ROI % | -29.4% | - |
| Units P/L | -5.00u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Gombos
0
Stebe
Apr 17, 2022
Belgrade
C Clay · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 6, 2019
Bratislava 2
H Hard · Round of 32
Nov 10, 2016
Bratislava
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Gombos | Stebe |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 75.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.9% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4.5 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 54.4% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 32.3% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48.4% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 42.8% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 17.3 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 30.9 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 55.1% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.9% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Norbert Gombos and Cedrik-Marcel Stebe face off in the Round of 16 at Bratislava on Hard.
Norbert Gombos leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Norbert Gombos is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Dalibor Svrcina (Jun 17).
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Stefan Kozlov (Feb 2).
Share this match
