ITF M25 · Round of 16 · M25 Ueberlingen
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Schell
⚙️ Grinder
Kellovsky
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs 🪃 Counterpuncher is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 4,082 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Niklas Schell plays Dominik Kellovsky.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Schell | Kellovsky |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–2 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.38 | - |
| ROI % | +32.8% | - |
| Units P/L | +1.64u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Schell
0
Kellovsky
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Schell | Kellovsky |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62.5% | 74.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 69.2% | 54.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 55.6% | 40% |
| Aces / Match | 5 | 1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4.1 | 2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 50.9% | 33.3% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 30.3% | 36.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 42.7% | 38.9% |
| BP Converted % | 33.2% | 16.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 48.8% | 43.4% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 60% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Niklas Schell and Dominik Kellovsky face off in the Round of 16 at M25 Ueberlingen on Clay.
Niklas Schell leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Niklas Schell is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Dominic Stricker (Jun 18).
Dominik Kellovsky is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Francesco Ferrari (Apr 13).
Share this match
