ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Bergamo
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Fatic
🪃 Counterpuncher
Safwat
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 4,082 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Nerman Fatic plays Mohamed Safwat.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Fatic | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 9–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.01 | - |
| ROI % | +26.5% | - |
| Units P/L | +3.44u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Fatic
0
Safwat
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Fatic | Safwat |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 63.5% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.4% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 53.4% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 3.4 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1.6 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.6% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 34.9% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 41% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 21 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 26.3 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 71.5% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.9% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Nerman Fatic and Mohamed Safwat face off in the Round of 32 at Bergamo on Hard.
Nerman Fatic leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Nerman Fatic is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kyrian Jacquet (May 24).
Mohamed Safwat is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Ivan Gretskiy (Sep 1).
Share this match
