ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 16 · Salzburg
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Fatic
🪃 Counterpuncher
Rodionov
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 4,082 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Nerman Fatic plays Jurij Rodionov.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Fatic | Rodionov |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 9–4 | 14–8 |
| Avg odds | 2.01 | 2.00 |
| ROI % | +26.5% | +23.2% |
| Units P/L | +3.44u | +5.10u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Fatic
0
Rodionov
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Rodionov has a higher win rate against shared opponents (50% vs Fatic's 0%).
| Opponent | Fatic | Rodionov |
|---|---|---|
| Zsombor Piros | L 36 46 | L 57 26 |
| Nicolas Jarry | L 16 46 | W 67 76 76 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Fatic | Rodionov |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 63.5% | 59.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.4% | 71.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 53.4% | 52.5% |
| Aces / Match | 3.4 | 5.1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1.6 | 2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.6% | 53.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 34.9% | 29.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.1% | 47.8% |
| BP Converted % | 41% | 31.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 21 | 25 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 26.3 | 28 |
| Net Pts Won % | 71.5% | 60.2% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.9% | 50.1% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 64% | 60% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Nerman Fatic and Jurij Rodionov face off in the Round of 16 at Salzburg on Clay.
Nerman Fatic leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Nerman Fatic is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kyrian Jacquet (May 24).
Jurij Rodionov is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Henry Searle (Jun 19).
Share this match
