ITF M15 · Round of 32 · M15 Bol
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Fatic
🪃 Counterpuncher
Voljavec
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 4,082 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Nerman Fatic plays Antonio Voljavec.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Fatic | Voljavec |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 9–4 | 1–2 |
| Avg odds | 2.01 | 3.87 |
| ROI % | +26.5% | -54.7% |
| Units P/L | +3.44u | -1.64u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Fatic
0
Voljavec
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Fatic has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Voljavec's 0%).
| Opponent | Fatic | Voljavec |
|---|---|---|
| Dimitar Kuzmanov | W 75 60 | L |
| Dusan Obradovic | W 75 63 | L 06 06 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Fatic | Voljavec |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 63.5% | 67.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68.4% | 51.2% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 53.4% | 37.1% |
| Aces / Match | 3.4 | 1.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.6% | 45.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 34.9% | 28.3% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.1% | 40% |
| BP Converted % | 41% | 23.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 21 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 26.3 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 71.5% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.9% | 40.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 64% | 33% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Nerman Fatic and Antonio Voljavec face off in the Round of 32 at M15 Bol on Clay.
Nerman Fatic leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Nerman Fatic is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kyrian Jacquet (May 24).
Antonio Voljavec is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Dimitar Kuzmanov (Jun 18).
Share this match
