WTA 500 · Quarterfinals · Prague
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Hibino
🏃 Pusher
Martincova
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🏃 Pusher archetype wins about 53% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 196 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Nao Hibino here.
Pusher players often use extreme retrieval and low error rate to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Hibino | Martincova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | - | 5.70 |
| ROI % | - | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Hibino
0
Martincova
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Hibino | Martincova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 81.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 37.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 33.3% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 33.3% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 45.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 26.7% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 22.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 39.3% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Nao Hibino and Tereza Martincova face off in the Quarterfinals at Prague on Hard.
Nao Hibino leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Nao Hibino is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Mia Pohankova (Oct 27).
Tereza Martincova is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Camila Osorio (May 18).
Share this match