WTA 250 · Quarterfinals · Bol
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Hibino
🪃 Counterpuncher
Voegele
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 65% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,848 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Nao Hibino here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Hibino | Voegele |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–7 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.01 | - |
| ROI % | -36.1% | - |
| Units P/L | -4.33u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Hibino
0
Voegele
Jun 6, 2016
's Hertogenbosch
G Grass · Round of 32
May 30, 2016
Bol
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Hibino | Voegele |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 69% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 54% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 38.4% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.2 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 51.8% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 59% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 40% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 45.9% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 33% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Nao Hibino and Stefanie Voegele face off in the Quarterfinals at Bol on Clay.
Nao Hibino leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Nao Hibino is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Darja Semenistaja (Jun 24).
Stefanie Voegele is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Errani (Apr 4).
Share this match
