WTA 500 · Round of 32 · Strasbourg
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Hibino
🪃 Counterpuncher
Stephens
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 65% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,848 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Nao Hibino here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Hibino | Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–7 | 1–4 |
| Avg odds | 2.01 | 3.74 |
| ROI % | -36.1% | -68.2% |
| Units P/L | -4.33u | -3.41u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Hibino
0
Stephens
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Hibino | Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 69% | 65.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 54% | 48.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 38.4% | 46.8% |
| Aces / Match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.5 | 2.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 51.8% | 56.2% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37% | 25.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 59% | 39.4% |
| BP Converted % | 40% | 49.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 45.9% | 40.1% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 33% | 17% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Nao Hibino and Sloane Stephens face off in the Round of 32 at Strasbourg on Clay.
Nao Hibino leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Nao Hibino is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Darja Semenistaja (Jun 24).
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (May 25).
Share this match
