WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Hong Kong
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Hibino
🪃 Counterpuncher
Stosur
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 54% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 2,124 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Samantha Stosur here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Hibino | Stosur |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–7 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.01 | - |
| ROI % | -36.1% | - |
| Units P/L | -4.33u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Hibino
0
Stosur
Oct 8, 2018
Hong Kong
H Hard · Round of 32
Jan 29, 2018
Taipei
H Hard · Round of 32
Oct 10, 2016
Hong Kong
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Hibino | Stosur |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 69% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 54% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 38.4% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.2 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 51.8% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 59% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 40% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 45.9% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 25% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Nao Hibino and Samantha Stosur face off in the Round of 32 at Hong Kong on Hard.
Nao Hibino leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Nao Hibino is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Darja Semenistaja (Jun 24).
Samantha Stosur is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Harmony Tan (May 16).
Share this match
