WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Beijing
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Podoroska
🏃 Pusher
Yastremska
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 🎾 All-Court archetype wins about 70% vs 🏃 Pusher across 67 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Dayana Yastremska here.
All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Podoroska | Yastremska |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.56 |
| ROI % | - | +3.4% |
| Units P/L | - | +0.17u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Podoroska
1
Yastremska
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Podoroska | Yastremska |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 57.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 64.3% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 48.3% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 7.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 50.7% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 37.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 53.3% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 47.8% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 50.4% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Nadia Podoroska and Dayana Yastremska face off in the Round of 64 at Beijing on Hard.
Nadia Podoroska leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Nadia Podoroska is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Karolina Muchova (Jan 13).
Dayana Yastremska is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Anastasia Zakharova (May 5).
Share this match
