WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Luxembourg
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Barthel
👑 The Complete Package
Stephens
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 67% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,444 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Mona Barthel here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Barthel | Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–2 | 1–4 |
| Avg odds | 1.76 | 3.74 |
| ROI % | -23.8% | -68.2% |
| Units P/L | -1.19u | -3.41u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Barthel
1
Stephens
Oct 19, 2015
Luxembourg
H Hard · Round of 32
Aug 17, 2015
Cincinnati
H Hard · Round of 32
Apr 6, 2015
Charleston
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Barthel | Stephens |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57.3% | 65.6% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.8% | 48.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 44% | 46.8% |
| Aces / Match | 4.4 | 0.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 8.6 | 2.3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 51% | 56.2% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 40.5% | 25.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 61.5% | 39.4% |
| BP Converted % | 50.8% | 49.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 54.6% | 40.1% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 100% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Mona Barthel and Sloane Stephens face off in the Round of 32 at Luxembourg on Hard.
Mona Barthel leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Mona Barthel is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hanne Vandewinkel (Jun 6).
Sloane Stephens is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (May 25).
Share this match
