WTA 500 · Round of 32 · Cluj-Napoca 2
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Barthel
🤖 Servebot
Bondar
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 53% vs 🤖 Servebot across 576 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Anna Bondar here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the servebot's high ace rate. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Barthel | Bondar |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–3 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.64 |
| ROI % | - | -28.8% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.73u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Barthel
0
Bondar
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Barthel | Bondar |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 62.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 63.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 48.3% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 3.6 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 1.9 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 64% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 34.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 58.2% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 46.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 50.9% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 33% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Mona Barthel and Anna Bondar face off in the Round of 32 at Cluj-Napoca 2 on Hard.
Mona Barthel leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Mona Barthel is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Linda Fruhvirtova (Feb 1).
Anna Bondar is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Anhelina Kalinina (May 18).
Share this match
