ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Bergamo
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Safwat
⚙️ Grinder
Bonzi
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 5,936 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Benjamin Bonzi here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Safwat | Bonzi |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 9–8 |
| Avg odds | - | 4.02 |
| ROI % | - | +3.7% |
| Units P/L | - | +0.63u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Safwat
1
Bonzi
Sep 18, 2021
Istanbul
H Hard · Semifinals
Feb 10, 2018
Bergamo
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Safwat | Bonzi |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 64.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 67.3% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 51.9% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 3.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 49.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 29.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 49% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 28.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 23.5 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 25.8 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 61.5% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 48.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Mohamed Safwat and Benjamin Bonzi face off in the Round of 32 at Bergamo on Hard.
Mohamed Safwat leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Mohamed Safwat is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Ivan Gretskiy (Sep 1).
Benjamin Bonzi is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Christopher O'Connell (Jun 18).
Share this match
