ATP Challenger Tour Β· Round of 32 Β· Knoxville
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ymer
πͺ Counterpuncher
Majchrzak
π€ Servebot
Matchup analysis
The π€ Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs πͺ Counterpuncher across 4,477 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Kamil Majchrzak here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Ymer | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 7β5 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.30 |
| ROI % | - | +22.2% |
| Units P/L | - | +2.66u |
Prior meetings and scores Β· 3 career meetings
1
Ymer
2
Majchrzak
Apr 9, 2022
ATP Masters 1000 Monte-Carlo
C Clay Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 5, 2019
Phoenix
H Hard Β· Round of 64
Nov 7, 2018
Knoxville
H Hard Β· Round of 32
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Ymer | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 67.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 71.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 6.6 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 58.3% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 25.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 47.6% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 28.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 29.7 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 31.9 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 64.2% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 48.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Mikael Ymer and Kamil Majchrzak face off in the Round of 32 at Knoxville on Hard.
Mikael Ymer leads 1-2 over 3 previous meetings.
Mikael Ymer is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Elias Ymer (Oct 14).
Kamil Majchrzak is 5-0 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Daniil Medvedev (Jun 13).
Share this match