WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Bucharest
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Buzarnescu
⚙️ Grinder
Kovinic
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,716 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Danka Kovinic here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Buzarnescu | Kovinic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 0–3 |
| Avg odds | - | 6.78 |
| ROI % | - | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -3.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Buzarnescu
0
Kovinic
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Buzarnescu | Kovinic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 53.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 44.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 28% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 9 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 44.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 33.3% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 42.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 40.4% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Mihaela Buzarnescu and Danka Kovinic face off in the Round of 32 at Bucharest on Clay.
Mihaela Buzarnescu leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Mihaela Buzarnescu is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sorana Cirstea (Jul 14).
Danka Kovinic is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Miriam Bianca Bulgaru (Jun 16).
Share this match
