ITF M15 · Round of 16 · M15 Maanshan
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Zhukov
🪃 Counterpuncher
Cao
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 4,082 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Maxim Zhukov plays Adam Farag Cao.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Zhukov | Cao |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 1–0 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.68 |
| ROI % | - | +68.0% |
| Units P/L | - | +0.68u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Zhukov
0
Cao
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Zhukov has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Cao's 0%).
| Opponent | Zhukov | Cao |
|---|---|---|
| Akira Santillan | W 36 63 63 | L 36 16 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Zhukov | Cao |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 59.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 64.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 52% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 1.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 71.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 31.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 51.3% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 33% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 49.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Maxim Zhukov and Adam Farag Cao face off in the Round of 16 at M15 Maanshan on Hard.
Maxim Zhukov leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Maxim Zhukov is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Fitriadi M Rifqi (Mar 23).
Adam Farag Cao is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Zhengyu Sun (May 18).
Share this match
