ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Canberra
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Gigante
🪃 Counterpuncher
Nava
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 4,082 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Matteo Gigante plays Emilio Nava.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Gigante | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 16–9 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.98 |
| ROI % | - | -2.4% |
| Units P/L | - | -0.59u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Gigante
0
Nava
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Nava has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Gigante's 50%).
| Opponent | Gigante | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Patrick Kypson | L 36 26 | W 63 64 |
| Borna Coric | W 46 62 76 | W 63 75 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Gigante | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 65% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 69.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 47.2% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 5.6 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 3.2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 57.7% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 31.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 45.3% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 41.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 30.7 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 41.8 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 64.8% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 49.4% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Matteo Gigante and Emilio Nava face off in the Round of 32 at Canberra on Hard.
Matteo Gigante leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Matteo Gigante is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Clement Chidekh (Sep 23).
Emilio Nava is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hamish Stewart (Jun 20).
Share this match
