WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Lausanne
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Zanevska
👑 The Complete Package
Teichmann
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 61% vs 🎯 Baseliner across 442 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Maryna Zanevska here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the baseliner's precise groundstrokes. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Zanevska | Teichmann |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 6–1 |
| Avg odds | - | 3.66 |
| ROI % | - | +161.0% |
| Units P/L | - | +11.27u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Zanevska
1
Teichmann
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Zanevska | Teichmann |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 67.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 58.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 51.3% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 3.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 52.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 37.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 57.3% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 43.6% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 51.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 79% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Maryna Zanevska and Jil Teichmann face off in the Round of 32 at Lausanne on Clay.
Maryna Zanevska leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Maryna Zanevska is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Aryna Sabalenka (Aug 28).
Jil Teichmann is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Mirra Andreeva (May 31).
Share this match
