ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Prostejov
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Fucsovics
🎯 Baseliner
Berankis
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🎯 Baseliner vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 2,807 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Marton Fucsovics plays Ricardas Berankis.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Fucsovics | Berankis |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–5 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.64 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -5.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
1
Fucsovics
2
Berankis
Oct 5, 2016
Mons
H Hard · Round of 32
Jun 2, 2016
Prostejov
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Jul 22, 2015
Recanati
H Hard · Semifinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Fucsovics | Berankis |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.2% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.8% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 49.6% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 5.6 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5.4 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 62.9% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 24.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 44% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 29.4% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 21.5 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 28.5 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 75.4% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 48% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Marton Fucsovics and Ricardas Berankis face off in the Quarterfinals at Prostejov on Clay.
Marton Fucsovics leads 1-2 over 3 previous meetings.
Marton Fucsovics is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Brandon Nakashima (Jun 16).
Ricardas Berankis is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Milos Karol (Oct 26).
Share this match
