ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Guangzhou
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Fucsovics
🎯 Baseliner
Setkic
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 54% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,419 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Marton Fucsovics here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Fucsovics | Setkic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–5 | 0–2 |
| Avg odds | 2.64 | 1.59 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -5.00u | -2.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Fucsovics
0
Setkic
Jul 17, 2016
Segovia
H Hard · Round of 16
Mar 13, 2015
Guangzhou
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Fucsovics | Setkic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 61.2% | 70.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.8% | 65.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 49.6% | 41.1% |
| Aces / Match | 5.6 | 2.5 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5.4 | 3.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 62.9% | 23.4% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 24.6% | 30.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 44% | 49.7% |
| BP Converted % | 29.4% | 51.9% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 21.5 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 28.5 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 75.4% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 48% | 48.2% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Marton Fucsovics and Aldin Setkic face off in the Quarterfinals at Guangzhou on Hard.
Marton Fucsovics leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Marton Fucsovics is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Brandon Nakashima (Jun 16).
Aldin Setkic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Yurii Dzhavakian (Jun 17).
Share this match
