WTA 1000 · Round of 32 · Madrid
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Trevisan
🛡️ The Spoiler
Parks
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 59% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 512 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Alycia Parks here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Trevisan | Parks |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 7–7 | 5–10 |
| Avg odds | 1.72 | 2.60 |
| ROI % | -22.4% | -15.2% |
| Units P/L | -3.14u | -2.28u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Trevisan
0
Parks
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Trevisan | Parks |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 69.5% | 54.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 56.5% | 67.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 39.3% | 47.8% |
| Aces / Match | 0.5 | 4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 5.4 | 4.7 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.3% | 55.6% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 45.2% | 33.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 62.1% | 50.8% |
| BP Converted % | 46.2% | 46.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.2% | 49.1% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 56% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Martina Trevisan and Alycia Parks face off in the Round of 32 at Madrid on Clay.
Martina Trevisan leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Martina Trevisan is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Taylor Townsend (Jun 20).
Alycia Parks is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Emiliana Arango (Jun 20).
Share this match
