ATP 250 · Quarterfinals · Doha
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Cecchinato
🎾 All-Court
Lajovic
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🎾 All-Court archetype wins about 57% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,168 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Marco Cecchinato here.
All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Cecchinato | Lajovic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 10–9 | 10–9 |
| Avg odds | 2.14 | 1.81 |
| ROI % | -28.8% | -14.1% |
| Units P/L | -5.48u | -2.68u |
Prior meetings and scores · 5 career meetings
2
Cecchinato
3
Lajovic
Mar 12, 2026
Montemar ENE Construccion
C Clay · Round of 32
Sep 23, 2022
Genoa
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Feb 9, 2020
Rio de Janeiro
C Clay · Round of 32
Jan 3, 2019
Doha
H Hard · Quarterfinals
May 1, 2015
ATP Masters 1000 Rome
C Clay · 1st Round Qualifying
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Lajovic has a higher win rate against shared opponents (40% vs Cecchinato's 30%).
| Opponent | Cecchinato | Lajovic |
|---|---|---|
| Luca Van Assche | L 63 06 16 | L 36 16 |
| Jonas Forejtek | L 36 67 | W 62 57 64 |
| Carlo Alberto Caniato | W 46 63 64 | W 64 63 |
| Max Houkes | W 76 62 | L 67 46 |
| Alejandro Tabilo | L 36 16 | L 64 57 46 |
| Remy Bertola | W 60 63 | W 64 64 |
| Martin Landaluce | L 46 46 | L 36 16 |
| Sebastian Ofner | L 67 57 | W 63 62 |
| Thiago Monteiro | L 67 67 | L 62 36 36 |
| Francesco Passaro | L 75 46 26 | L 16 75 46 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Cecchinato | Lajovic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.1% | 67.8% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68% | 70.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 55.2% | 52% |
| Aces / Match | 2.8 | 4.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 59% | 59.3% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 35% | 31.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 52.6% | 47.4% |
| BP Converted % | 50.7% | 34.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 25.3 | 23.9 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 25.6 | 23.1 |
| Net Pts Won % | 73.6% | 59.7% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.5% | 50.4% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Luca Van Assche
Emilia-Romagna Tennis Cup · Quarterfinals
Jun 18
Federico Bondioli
Emilia-Romagna Tennis Cup · Round of 16
Jun 17
Jesper de Jong
SIC EUROPE OMAG OPEN · Quarterfinals
Jun 12
Alvaro Guillen Meza
SIC EUROPE OMAG OPEN · Round of 16
Jun 11
Petr Nesterov
SIC EUROPE OMAG OPEN · Round of 32
Jun 9
Oriol Roca Batalla
SIC EUROPE OMAG OPEN · Round of 16
Jun 11
Jonas Forejtek
SIC EUROPE OMAG OPEN · Round of 32
Jun 9
Henrique Rocha
Internazionali di Tennis Città di Perugia | G.I.MA. Tennis Cup · Round of 16
Jun 4
Gonzalo Bueno
Internazionali di Tennis Città di Perugia | G.I.MA. Tennis Cup · Round of 32
Jun 2
Jurij Rodionov
Roland Garros · 1st Round Qualifying
May 19
Matchup overview
Marco Cecchinato and Dusan Lajovic face off in the Quarterfinals at Doha on Hard.
Marco Cecchinato leads 2-3 over 5 previous meetings.
Marco Cecchinato is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Luca Van Assche (Jun 18).
Dusan Lajovic is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Oriol Roca Batalla (Jun 11).
Share this match
