ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Ostra Group Open By Porsche Servisni Centrum Ostrava
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Cecchinato
⚙️ Grinder
Michalski
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
⚙️ Grinder vs ⚔️ The Gladiator is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 2,579 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Marco Cecchinato plays Daniel Michalski.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Cecchinato | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 10–9 | 4–7 |
| Avg odds | 2.14 | 2.08 |
| ROI % | -29.1% | -41.3% |
| Units P/L | -5.52u | -4.54u |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Cecchinato
0
Michalski
Apr 27, 2026
Ostra Group Open By Porsche Servisni Centrum Ostrava
C Clay · Round of 32
Mar 6, 2025
Kigali 2
C Clay · Round of 16
Sep 27, 2022
Lisbon
C Clay · Round of 32
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Cecchinato has a higher win rate against shared opponents (63% vs Michalski's 13%).
| Opponent | Cecchinato | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| Federico Bondioli | W 62 63 | L 46 36 |
| Andrej Martin | W 76 63 | L 36 63 67 |
| Ilia Simakin | W 63 64 | L 76 16 36 |
| Andrea Pellegrino | L 67 26 | L 36 76 26 |
| Felix Gill | L 67 26 | L 67 57 |
| Arthur Gea | W 63 64 | L 36 67 |
| Santiago Rodriguez Taverna | W 63 63 | L 57 26 |
| Federico Coria | L 46 26 | W 75 16 64 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Cecchinato | Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 64.1% | 61% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 68% | 66.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 55.2% | 47.7% |
| Aces / Match | 2.8 | 2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 59% | 35.3% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 35% | 26.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 52.6% | 50.3% |
| BP Converted % | 50.7% | 46.8% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 25.6 | 18.3 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 28.6 | 20.5 |
| Net Pts Won % | 68.4% | 50.9% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.5% | 48.2% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 57% | 13% |
Last five matches per player
Luca Van Assche
Emilia-Romagna Tennis Cup · Quarterfinals
Jun 18
Federico Bondioli
Emilia-Romagna Tennis Cup · Round of 16
Jun 17
Jesper de Jong
SIC EUROPE OMAG OPEN · Quarterfinals
Jun 12
Alvaro Guillen Meza
SIC EUROPE OMAG OPEN · Round of 16
Jun 11
Petr Nesterov
SIC EUROPE OMAG OPEN · Round of 32
Jun 9
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
PLOVDIV CHALLENGER · Quarterfinals
Jun 25
Gijs Brouwer
PLOVDIV CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jun 22
Gustavo Heide
Enea Poznan Open · Round of 32
Jun 16
Andrej Martin
Bratislava Open · 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 8
Viktor Durasovic
Unicredit Czech Open · 2nd Round Qualifying
Jun 1
Match summary
Marco Cecchinato meets Daniel Michalski in the Round of 32 at the Ostra Group Open By Porsche Servisni Centrum Ostrava on April 27, playing on outdoor clay. The Italian ranks 188th globally while Michalski sits at 287th, with Cecchinato arriving off a two-match losing streak after one match in two weeks.
Cecchinato leads their head-to-head 2-0, though both players have struggled recently. Cecchinato has won 2 of his last 5 matches and sits at 50% over 10 matches; Michalski has won only 1 of his last 5 and has not played in four weeks. On clay specifically, Cecchinato holds a 55% record while Michalski's stands at 35%. Both have faced Arthur Gea and Santiago Rodriguez Taverna on the red clay circuit, with differing results across those encounters.
Cecchinato operates as a counterpuncher who reads the court and constructs points from defensive positions, a strength on a surface that rewards patience. Michalski plays a more aggressive, physically demanding style built on holding the baseline and imposing pressure. The match will test whether Cecchinato can regain his rhythm on clay after recent losses, while Michalski needs to assert control and minimize the opportunities his opponent thrives on defending and redirecting.
Share this match