WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Warsaw
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Chwalinska
⚙️ Grinder
Masarova
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 60% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,639 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Rebeka Masarova here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Chwalinska | Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 14–3 | 8–4 |
| Avg odds | 2.30 | 2.60 |
| ROI % | +89.5% | +13.3% |
| Units P/L | +15.21u | +1.60u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Chwalinska
0
Masarova
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Chwalinska and Masarova posted a 0% win rate.
| Opponent | Chwalinska | Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | L 67 26 | L |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Chwalinska | Masarova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 68% | 61.9% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 60.7% | 70.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.9% | 23.4% |
| Aces / Match | 1.7 | 4.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2 | 6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 46.7% | 49.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 33.2% | 32.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 62.7% | 40.7% |
| BP Converted % | 44.5% | 55% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.4% | 44.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 86% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Maja Chwalinska and Rebeka Masarova face off in the Round of 32 at Warsaw on Clay.
Maja Chwalinska leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Maja Chwalinska is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Mirra Andreeva (Jun 6).
Rebeka Masarova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jil Teichmann (Jun 23).
Share this match
