WTA 500 · Quarterfinals · Charleston
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Keys
💥 Big Hitter
Davis
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,716 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Madison Keys here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Keys | Davis |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 14–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.38 | - |
| ROI % | +98.0% | - |
| Units P/L | +17.64u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Keys
0
Davis
Jun 20, 2022
Eastbourne
G Grass · Round of 32
Jun 28, 2021
Wimbledon
G Grass · Round of 64
Apr 6, 2015
Charleston
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Keys | Davis |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62.5% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 71.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 43.7% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 5.2 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 43.8% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 39% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.7% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 56.8% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.6% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 78% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Madison Keys and Lauren Davis face off in the Quarterfinals at Charleston on Clay.
Madison Keys leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Madison Keys is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Mccartney Kessler (Jun 25).
Lauren Davis is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Eleejah Inisan (Jun 9).
Share this match
