Maddison InglisvsLaura Siegemund

January 19, 2026H Hard

Match Result

Final score & match stats

#168Maddison Inglis

66³7⁹

#46Laura Siegemund

47⁷6⁷

InglisSiegemund

1st Serve %62%71%

1st Serve Won62%62%

2nd Serve Won52%47%

Serve Pts Won58%58%

BP Saved5/104/10

BP Converted6/105/10

Return Pts Won42%42%

Total Pts Won50%50%

Aces27

Double Faults34

Archetype Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Inglis

⚙️ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude

Siegemund

🪃 Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 65% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 793 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Laura Siegemund here.

Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

Metric	Inglis	Siegemund
W-L	-	5–3
Avg odds	-	2.25
ROI %	-	+15.1%
Units P/L	-	+1.21u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Head-to-Head

Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting

Inglis

Siegemund

Jan 19, 2026

Australian Open

H Hard · Round of 64

6³7⁷

7⁹6⁷

Inglis

Common Opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Across 2 shared opponents, both Inglis and Siegemund posted a 0% win rate.

Opponent	Inglis	Siegemund
Iga Swiatek	L 06 36	L 26 36
Caty Mcnally	L 26 36	L 46 26

Mechanics

Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days

Stat	Inglis	Siegemund
Serve
1st Serve In %	0%	74.5%
1st Serve Pts Won %	0%	58.5%
2nd Serve Pts Won %	0%	47.6%
Aces / Match	0	1.4
Double Faults / Match	0	2.7
Break Points Saved %	0%	56.3%
Return
1st Return Pts Won %	0%	37.1%
2nd Return Pts Won %	0%	57.5%
BP Converted %	0%	44.9%
Rally
Winners / Match	0	0
Unforced Errors / Match	0	0
Net Pts Won %	0%	0%
Total Pts Won %	0%	50.1%
Surface (Hard)
Hard Win %	0%	50%