Grand Slam · 1st Round Qualifying · US Open
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Broady
🪃 Counterpuncher
Cassone
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 2,526 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Liam Broady plays Murphy Cassone.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Broady | Cassone |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 10–0 | 7–9 |
| Avg odds | 1.45 | 2.00 |
| ROI % | +45.5% | -31.5% |
| Units P/L | +4.55u | -5.04u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Broady
0
Cassone
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Broady | Cassone | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 or more | 80% | 8/10 | 94% | 15/16 |
| 3 or more | 50% | 5/10 | 69% | 11/16 |
| 5 or more | 20% | 2/10 | 50% | 8/16 |
| 10 or more | 10% | 1/10 | 6% | 1/16 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/10 | 0% | 0/16 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/10 | 0% | 0/16 |
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Broady has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Cassone's 33%).
| Opponent | Broady | Cassone |
|---|---|---|
| August Holmgren | W 63 46 64 | L 26 36 |
| Harry Wendelken | W 36 62 62 | W 76 64 |
| Andre Ilagan | W 64 61 | L 61 26 36 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Broady | Cassone |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 65.7% | 66.1% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 72.6% | 69.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 57.7% | 52.2% |
| Aces / Match | 3 | 4.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 1.6 | 1.7 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.7% | 54.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 37% | 25.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 63.1% | 52.2% |
| BP Converted % | 47% | 34.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 17.8 | 16.1 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 26.9 | 25.9 |
| Net Pts Won % | 60% | 76.4% |
| Total Pts Won % | 56.9% | 49.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 100% | 44% |
Last five matches per player
Beibit Zhukayev
Gwangju Open · Round of 32
Apr 21
August Holmgren
Renault Busan Open Tennis Championships · Quarterfinals
Apr 17
Ilya Ivashka
Renault Busan Open Tennis Championships · Round of 16
Apr 16
Murphy Cassone
Renault Busan Open Tennis Championships · Round of 32
Apr 14
Harry Wendelken
Koyushokucho Miyazaki Challenger · Final
Apr 5
Liam Broady
Renault Busan Open Tennis Championships · Round of 32
Apr 14
Mattia Bellucci
Miami Open presented by Itau · 2nd Round Qualifying
Mar 17
Francesco Maestrelli
Miami Open presented by Itau · 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 16
Pavel Kotov
Challenger Cherbourg La Manche · Quarterfinals
Mar 13
Dan Added
Challenger Cherbourg La Manche · Round of 16
Mar 11
Match summary
Liam Broady and Murphy Cassone will meet in the Round of 32 of the Renault Busan Open Tennis Championships on hard court on April 12, 2026. Both players are ranked in the 250s, with Broady at number 250 and Cassone at number 253. This will be their second career meeting after Broady won their first encounter.
The two players have split results against common opponents in recent weeks. Broady defeated Andre Ilagan while Cassone fell to him, but Cassone notched a win over Patrick Zahraj after Broady lost that match. Both players found success against Charles Broom and Harry Wendelken, keeping the head-to-head dynamic fairly even.
Broady arrives in strong form with a six-match winning streak and a 90% win rate over his last ten matches. He's played four matches in the past two weeks and comes in off a nine-day break. Cassone, by contrast, hasn't played in 28 days and carries a recent loss. Over his last ten matches, Cassone holds a 60% win rate.
Broady operates as a counterpuncher who reads the court well and capitalizes on his opponent's mistakes. Cassone plays a grinding, patient style from the baseline. On hard courts specifically, Broady has posted a 65% win rate while Cassone has fared slightly better at 70%. The surface favors quicker points and players with solid serve mechanics, which both bring to the court.
Share this match
