ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Playford
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Tu
🤖 Servebot
Purtseladze
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🤖 Servebot vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 8,831 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Li Tu plays Saba Purtseladze.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Tu | Purtseladze |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 9–5 | 3–8 |
| Avg odds | 1.62 | 3.53 |
| ROI % | -6.7% | -70.4% |
| Units P/L | -0.94u | -7.74u |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Tu
0
Purtseladze
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Tu | Purtseladze |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 62.2% | 56% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 72.7% | 66.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 53.3% | 44.6% |
| Aces / Match | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.9 | 6.4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 38.6% | 51% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 26.2% | 26.9% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 48.3% | 51.6% |
| BP Converted % | 38.8% | 32.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 15.7 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 26.3 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 45.8% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50% | 46.9% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 57% |
Last five matches per player
Lorenzo Carboni
Internazionali di Tennis Città di Perugia | G.I.MA. Tennis Cup · 1st Round Qualifying
May 31
Tommaso Compagnucci
CAME CUP 2026 CITTA' DI CERVIA · Round of 32
May 19
Lukas Neumayer
Internazionali Di Tennis - Citta'Di Vicenza · Round of 32
May 13
Fajing Sun
WUNING OPEN 2 · Final
Apr 19
Blake Ellis
WUNING OPEN 2 · Quarterfinals
Apr 17
Matchup overview
Li Tu and Saba Purtseladze face off in the Round of 32 at Playford on Hard.
Li Tu leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Li Tu is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Lorenzo Carboni (May 31).
Saba Purtseladze is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Milos Karol (May 31).
Share this match
