WTA 250 Β· Quarterfinals Β· Acapulco
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Tsurenko
π§± The Wall
Mladenovic
π Pusher
Matchup analysis
The π§± The Wall archetype wins about 74% vs π Pusher across 1,068 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Lesia Tsurenko here.
The Wall players often use elite returner and low unforced errors to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Tsurenko | Mladenovic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 0β1 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.35 |
| ROI % | - | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores Β· 4 career meetings
3
Tsurenko
1
Mladenovic
Feb 26, 2018
Acapulco
H Hard Β· Quarterfinals
Jun 12, 2017
's Hertogenbosch
G Grass Β· Quarterfinals
Feb 27, 2017
Acapulco
H Hard Β· Final
Feb 15, 2016
Dubai
H Hard Β· Round of 32
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Tsurenko | Mladenovic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Lesia Tsurenko and Kristina Mladenovic face off in the Quarterfinals at Acapulco on Hard.
Lesia Tsurenko leads 3-1 over 4 previous meetings.
Lesia Tsurenko is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Katie Boulter (Oct 7).
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Share this match