ATP Masters 1000 · Round of 128 · ATP Masters 1000 Shanghai
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Tien
🎯 Baseliner
Kecmanovic
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 53% vs 🎾 All-Court across 601 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Learner Tien here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Tien | Kecmanovic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 9–5 | 7–9 |
| Avg odds | 2.23 | 2.44 |
| ROI % | +4.9% | +0.4% |
| Units P/L | +0.69u | +0.07u |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Tien
1
Kecmanovic
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Tien | Kecmanovic | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 or more | 93% | 14/15 | 100% | 16/16 |
| 3 or more | 93% | 14/15 | 81% | 13/16 |
| 5 or more | 93% | 14/15 | 69% | 11/16 |
| 10 or more | 47% | 7/15 | 38% | 6/16 |
| 15 or more | 7% | 1/15 | 6% | 1/16 |
| 20 or more | 7% | 1/15 | 0% | 0/16 |
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Tien has a higher win rate against shared opponents (60% vs Kecmanovic's 30%).
| Opponent | Tien | Kecmanovic |
|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | L 36 76 16 67 | L 36 63 67 |
| Cameron Norrie | W 63 36 76 | L 26 64 67 |
| Kamil Majchrzak | L 26 64 26 | L 64 36 16 |
| Adam Walton | W 76 76 | L 62 57 26 |
| Ben Shelton | W 76 46 63 | L 75 36 46 |
| Flavio Cobolli | W 63 62 | L 63 36 46 |
| Tommy Paul | L 64 46 36 | W 57 64 64 |
| Nuno Borges | W 76 64 62 | W 60 67 64 |
| Alex Michelsen | L 46 26 | W 62 36 63 36 76 |
| Francisco Cerundolo | W 46 63 64 | L 57 61 67 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Tien | Kecmanovic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 63.3% | 60.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 74.5% | 73.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.1% | 49.9% |
| Aces / Match | 9.1 | 7.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.5 | 2.4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 63% | 45.8% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 31.6% | 25.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 50.4% | 49.4% |
| BP Converted % | 50.2% | 41.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 29.5 | 29.7 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 33 | 30.8 |
| Net Pts Won % | 74.7% | 69.6% |
| Total Pts Won % | 51.8% | 49.7% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 62% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Fayez Sarofim & Co. U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship · Quarterfinals
Apr 3
Nishesh Basavareddy
Fayez Sarofim & Co. U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship · Round of 16
Apr 2
Kamil Majchrzak
Miami Open presented by Itau · Round of 64
Mar 21
Jannik Sinner
BNP Paribas Open · Quarterfinals
Mar 12
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
BNP Paribas Open · Round of 16
Mar 10
Alexander Zverev
BMW Open by Bitpanda · Round of 32
Apr 14
Cameron Norrie
Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters · Round of 64
Apr 5
Kamil Majchrzak
Miami Open presented by Itau · Round of 128
Mar 19
Adam Walton
Republica Dominicana Open - Copa Cap Cana · Quarterfinals
Mar 13
Mackenzie McDonald
Republica Dominicana Open - Copa Cap Cana · Round of 16
Mar 12
Matchup overview
Learner Tien and Miomir Kecmanovic face off in the Round of 128 at ATP Masters 1000 Shanghai on Hard.
Learner Tien leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Learner Tien is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Roman Andres Burruchaga (Apr 3).
Miomir Kecmanovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alexander Zverev (Apr 14).
Share this match
