Grand Slam · 3rd Round Qualifying · Australian Open
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Tien
⚙️ Grinder
Kovalik
🏃 Pusher
Matchup analysis
The ⚙️ Grinder archetype wins about 58% vs 🏃 Pusher across 408 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Learner Tien here.
Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Tien | Kovalik |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.08 | - |
| ROI % | +26.8% | - |
| Units P/L | +3.21u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Tien
0
Kovalik
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Tien and Kovalik posted a 0% win rate.
| Opponent | Tien | Kovalik |
|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Jarry | L 26 26 36 | L 36 46 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Tien | Kovalik |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 66.1% | 53.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 63.6% | 61.3% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 53.8% | 51.9% |
| Aces / Match | 3.3 | 1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.3 | 4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 54.4% | 50% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 34.1% | 33.3% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 51.1% | 34.6% |
| BP Converted % | 54.2% | 100% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 21.8 | 18 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 31.2 | 33 |
| Net Pts Won % | 63.7% | 25% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.6% | 45.3% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Learner Tien and Jozef Kovalik face off in the 3rd Round Qualifying at Australian Open on Hard.
Learner Tien leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Learner Tien is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Flavio Cobolli (May 30).
Jozef Kovalik is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Andrej Martin (May 26).
Share this match
