WTA 500 · Round of 32 · Charleston 1
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Davis
⚙️ Grinder
Kenin
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,716 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Sofia Kenin here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Davis | Kenin |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.89 |
| ROI % | - | -37.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -3.70u |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Davis
1
Kenin
Apr 5, 2021
Charleston 1
C Clay · Round of 32
Jul 29, 2019
Washington
H Hard · Round of 16
Aug 28, 2017
US Open
H Hard · Round of 128
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Davis | Kenin |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 65.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 63.4% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 45.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 2.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 3.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 38.2% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 31.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 57.6% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 48.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 49% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 22% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Lauren Davis and Sofia Kenin face off in the Round of 32 at Charleston 1 on Clay.
Lauren Davis leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Lauren Davis is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Eleejah Inisan (Jun 9).
Sofia Kenin is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Daria Snigur (Jun 20).
Share this match
