WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Hobart
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Davis
⚙️ Grinder
Linette
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 60% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,630 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Magda Linette here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Davis | Linette |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 10–5 |
| Avg odds | - | 3.42 |
| ROI % | - | +64.8% |
| Units P/L | - | +9.72u |
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
2
Davis
2
Linette
Aug 10, 2020
Lexington
H Hard · Round of 32
Jan 13, 2020
Hobart
H Hard · Round of 16
Sep 14, 2015
Tokyo
H Hard · Round of 32
Jun 8, 2015
Nottingham
G Grass · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Davis | Linette |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 50.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 59.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 49.9% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 2.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 28.9% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 23.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 50.8% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 30.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 44.1% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Lauren Davis and Magda Linette face off in the Round of 16 at Hobart on Hard.
Lauren Davis leads 2-2 over 4 previous meetings.
Lauren Davis is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Eleejah Inisan (Jun 9).
Magda Linette is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Barbora Krejcikova (Jun 13).
Share this match
