WTA 500 · Round of 64 · Charleston
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Siegemund
🏹 Frontrunner
Tig
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🏹 Frontrunner archetype wins about 60% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 820 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Laura Siegemund here.
Frontrunner players often use fast starts and aggressive openers to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Siegemund | Tig |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–7 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.38 | - |
| ROI % | -27.4% | - |
| Units P/L | -3.29u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
3
Siegemund
1
Tig
Sep 9, 2019
Hiroshima
H Hard · Round of 16
Jul 15, 2019
Bucharest
C Clay · Semifinals
Aug 29, 2016
US Open
H Hard · Round of 128
Apr 4, 2016
Charleston
C Clay · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Siegemund | Tig |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 75.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 55.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 45.6% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.3 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 57.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 38.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 60.8% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 52.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.1% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 50% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Laura Siegemund and Patricia Maria Tig face off in the Round of 64 at Charleston on Clay.
Laura Siegemund leads 3-1 over 4 previous meetings.
Laura Siegemund is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Amanda Anisimova (Jun 10).
Patricia Maria Tig is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Briana Szabo (Aug 25).
Share this match
