WTA 500 · Round of 32 · St. Petersburg
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Siegemund
🏹 Frontrunner
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Matchup analysis
The 🏹 Frontrunner archetype wins about 73% vs 🏃 Pusher across 171 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Laura Siegemund here.
Frontrunner players often use fast starts and aggressive openers to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Siegemund | Mladenovic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–8 | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | 3.26 | 1.35 |
| ROI % | -33.0% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -4.29u | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Siegemund
0
Mladenovic
Sep 28, 2020
Roland Garros
C Clay · Round of 128
Apr 24, 2017
Stuttgart
C Clay · Final
Feb 8, 2016
St. Petersburg
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Siegemund | Mladenovic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 75.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 55.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 45.6% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.3 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 57.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 38.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 60.8% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 52.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.1% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Laura Siegemund and Kristina Mladenovic face off in the Round of 32 at St. Petersburg on Hard.
Laura Siegemund leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Laura Siegemund is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (Jun 23).
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Share this match
