WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Olympics
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Siegemund
🏹 Frontrunner
Flipkens
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 🏹 Frontrunner archetype wins about 54% vs 🎯 Baseliner across 236 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Laura Siegemund here.
Frontrunner players often use fast starts and aggressive openers to pressure the baseliner's precise groundstrokes. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Siegemund | Flipkens |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–8 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.26 | - |
| ROI % | -33.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -4.29u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Siegemund
1
Flipkens
Jan 6, 2021
Abu Dhabi
H Hard · Round of 64
Aug 8, 2016
Olympics
H Hard · Round of 16
Oct 19, 2015
Luxembourg
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Siegemund | Flipkens |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 75.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 55.7% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 45.6% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 1.3 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.1 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 57.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 38.2% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 60.8% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 52.1% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 50.1% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Laura Siegemund and Kirsten Flipkens face off in the Round of 16 at Olympics on Hard.
Laura Siegemund leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Laura Siegemund is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (Jun 23).
Kirsten Flipkens is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Alena Kovackova (Jun 7).
Share this match
