ATP 500 · Round of 16 · Beijing
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Edmund
💥 Big Hitter
Berrettini
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs 💥 Big Hitter across 4,477 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Matteo Berrettini here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the big hitter's power groundstrokes. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Edmund | Berrettini |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 8–5 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.82 |
| ROI % | - | +9.2% |
| Units P/L | - | +1.20u |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Edmund
1
Berrettini
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Edmund | Berrettini |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 64.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 68.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 48% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 5.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 1.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 50% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 28.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 41.9% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 38% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 14.8 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 23.4 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 48.6% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 47.8% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matteo Arnaldi
Roland Garros · Quarterfinals
Jun 3
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Roland Garros · Round of 16
May 31
Francisco Comesana
Roland Garros · Round of 32
May 29
Arthur Rinderknech
Roland Garros · Round of 64
May 28
Marton Fucsovics
Roland Garros · Round of 128
May 26
Matchup overview
Kyle Edmund and Matteo Berrettini face off in the Round of 16 at Beijing on Hard.
Kyle Edmund leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Kyle Edmund is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jack Pinnington Jones (Jul 13).
Matteo Berrettini is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Matteo Arnaldi (Jun 3).
Share this match
