WTA 500 · Round of 32 · Tokyo
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Nara
🎾 All-Court
Putintseva
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 55% vs 🎾 All-Court across 152 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Yulia Putintseva here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Nara | Putintseva |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5–6 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.43 |
| ROI % | - | -13.8% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.52u |
Prior meetings and scores · 4 career meetings
2
Nara
2
Putintseva
Sep 18, 2017
Tokyo
H Hard · Round of 32
Sep 12, 2016
Japan Open Tokyo
H Hard · Round of 16
Apr 4, 2016
Charleston
C Clay · Round of 64
Aug 3, 2015
Washington
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Nara | Putintseva |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 67.3% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 54.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 44.4% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 1.6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 56.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 37.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 49.1% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 36.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 47.2% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kurumi Nara and Yulia Putintseva face off in the Round of 32 at Tokyo on Hard.
Kurumi Nara leads 2-2 over 4 previous meetings.
Kurumi Nara is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Viktoriya Tomova (Jun 7).
Yulia Putintseva is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alicia Dudeney (Jun 13).
Share this match
