WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Tashkent
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Pliskova
🤖 Servebot
Tormo
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 54% vs ⚔️ The Gladiator across 897 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Kristyna Pliskova here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Pliskova | Tormo |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 6–4 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.86 |
| ROI % | - | +8.9% |
| Units P/L | - | +0.89u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Pliskova
0
Tormo
May 7, 2018
Madrid
C Clay · Round of 32
Sep 26, 2016
Tashkent
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Pliskova | Tormo |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 83.2% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 58.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 38.7% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 48.7% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 57.3% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 54.5% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 52.2% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 55.9% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kristyna Pliskova and Sara Sorribes Tormo face off in the Round of 32 at Tashkent on Hard.
Kristyna Pliskova leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Kristyna Pliskova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Bassols Ribera (May 20).
Sara Sorribes Tormo is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Maria Timofeeva (Jun 6).
Share this match
