WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Shenzhen
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Pliskova
🤖 Servebot
Ostapenko
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 59% vs 🤖 Servebot across 2,242 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Jelena Ostapenko here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the servebot's high ace rate. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Pliskova | Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 11–6 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.76 |
| ROI % | - | +0.7% |
| Units P/L | - | +0.11u |
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Pliskova
1
Ostapenko
Jan 1, 2018
Shenzhen
H Hard · Round of 32
May 1, 2017
Prague
C Clay · Semifinals
Apr 4, 2016
Katowice
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Pliskova | Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 58.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 66.2% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 43.9% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 7.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 58.9% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 41.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 61.1% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 56.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 53% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kristyna Pliskova and Jelena Ostapenko face off in the Round of 32 at Shenzhen on Hard.
Kristyna Pliskova leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Kristyna Pliskova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Bassols Ribera (May 20).
Jelena Ostapenko is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Zeynep Sonmez (Jun 25).
Share this match
