WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Moscow
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Putintseva
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 64% vs 🏃 Pusher across 154 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Yulia Putintseva here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Mladenovic | Putintseva |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 5–6 |
| Avg odds | 1.35 | 2.43 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -13.8% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -1.52u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Mladenovic
1
Putintseva
Oct 14, 2019
Moscow
H Hard · Round of 32
Jan 30, 2017
St. Petersburg
H Hard · Final
Mar 7, 2016
Indian Wells
H Hard · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Mladenovic | Putintseva |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 67.3% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 54.5% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 44.4% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.8 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 1.6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 56.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 37.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 49.1% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 36.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 47.2% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kristina Mladenovic and Yulia Putintseva face off in the Round of 32 at Moscow on Hard.
Kristina Mladenovic leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Yulia Putintseva is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alicia Dudeney (Jun 13).
Share this match
