WTA 1000 · Semifinals · Madrid
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Kuznetsova
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 74% vs 🏃 Pusher across 1,306 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Svetlana Kuznetsova here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Mladenovic | Kuznetsova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.35 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Mladenovic
1
Kuznetsova
Jun 26, 2017
Eastbourne
G Grass · Round of 16
May 8, 2017
Madrid
C Clay · Semifinals
Aug 31, 2015
US Open
H Hard · Round of 128
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Mladenovic | Kuznetsova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kristina Mladenovic and Svetlana Kuznetsova face off in the Semifinals at Madrid on Clay.
Kristina Mladenovic leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Svetlana Kuznetsova is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove (Jun 28).
Share this match
