WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Hong Kong
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Hibino
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 78% vs 🏃 Pusher across 2,427 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Nao Hibino here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Mladenovic | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 5–7 |
| Avg odds | 1.35 | 2.01 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -36.1% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -4.33u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Mladenovic
0
Hibino
Feb 8, 2021
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 64
Oct 10, 2016
Hong Kong
H Hard · Round of 16
Aug 29, 2016
US Open
H Hard · Round of 128
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Mladenovic | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 69% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 54% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 38.4% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 51.8% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 37% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 59% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 40% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 45.9% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 25% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kristina Mladenovic and Nao Hibino face off in the Round of 16 at Hong Kong on Hard.
Kristina Mladenovic leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Nao Hibino is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Darja Semenistaja (Jun 24).
Share this match
