WTA 250 · Semifinals · Hong Kong
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Saville
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 🎾 All-Court archetype wins about 76% vs 🏃 Pusher across 217 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Daria Saville here.
All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Mladenovic | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.35 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
1
Mladenovic
2
Saville
Aug 14, 2017
Cincinnati
H Hard · Round of 64
Oct 10, 2016
Hong Kong
H Hard · Semifinals
Jan 18, 2016
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Mladenovic | Saville |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kristina Mladenovic and Daria Saville face off in the Semifinals at Hong Kong on Hard.
Kristina Mladenovic leads 1-2 over 3 previous meetings.
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Daria Saville is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Madison Keys (May 26).
Share this match
