WTA 250 · Quarterfinals · Hong Kong
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Sands
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 74% vs 🏃 Pusher across 1,306 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Bethanie Mattek Sands here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Mladenovic | Sands |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.35 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Mladenovic
1
Sands
Oct 10, 2016
Hong Kong
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Jan 19, 2015
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 64
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Mladenovic | Sands |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kristina Mladenovic and Bethanie Mattek Sands face off in the Quarterfinals at Hong Kong on Hard.
Kristina Mladenovic leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Bethanie Mattek Sands is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Linda Fruhvirtova (Jan 30).
Share this match
