WTA 500 · Round of 16 · Eastbourne
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Friedsam
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 74% vs 🏃 Pusher across 1,306 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Anna Lena Friedsam here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Grass, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Mladenovic | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 3–2 |
| Avg odds | 1.35 | 1.45 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -29.4% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -1.47u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Mladenovic
1
Friedsam
Mar 2, 2020
Lyon
H Hard · Round of 16
Jun 20, 2016
Eastbourne
G Grass · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Mladenovic | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 72.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 58% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 50.5% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 48.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 35.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 52.2% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 28.6% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 47.5% |
| Surface (Grass) | ||
| Grass Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kristina Mladenovic and Anna Lena Friedsam face off in the Round of 16 at Eastbourne on Grass.
Kristina Mladenovic leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Anna Lena Friedsam is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Clervie Ngounoue (Jun 23).
Share this match
