WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Moscow
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Sevastova
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 64% vs 🏃 Pusher across 154 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Anastasija Sevastova here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Mladenovic | Sevastova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.35 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Mladenovic
0
Sevastova
Aug 24, 2020
Cincinnati
H Hard · Round of 64
Oct 14, 2019
Moscow
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Mladenovic | Sevastova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kristina Mladenovic and Anastasija Sevastova face off in the Round of 16 at Moscow on Hard.
Kristina Mladenovic leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Anastasija Sevastova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Aliona Falei (Nov 24).
Share this match
