WTA 500 · Quarterfinals · Strasbourg
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Kudryavtseva
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The ⚙️ Grinder archetype wins about 63% vs 🏃 Pusher across 1,281 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Alla Kudryavtseva here.
Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Mladenovic | Kudryavtseva |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.35 | - |
| ROI % | -100.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Mladenovic
1
Kudryavtseva
Jul 25, 2016
Montreal
H Hard · Round of 64
May 16, 2016
Strasbourg
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Mladenovic | Kudryavtseva |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kristina Mladenovic and Alla Kudryavtseva face off in the Quarterfinals at Strasbourg on Clay.
Kristina Mladenovic leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Alla Kudryavtseva is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Erakovic (Sep 11).
Share this match
