WTA 1000 · Round of 16 · Madrid
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Bertens
💥 Big Hitter
Begu
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🎯 Baseliner is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 1,030 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Kiki Bertens plays Irina Camelia Begu.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Bertens | Begu |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.89 |
| ROI % | - | +40.4% |
| Units P/L | - | +2.02u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Bertens
0
Begu
Jan 20, 2020
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 128
May 8, 2017
Madrid
C Clay · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Bertens | Begu |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 74.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 44.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 23.1% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 45.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 36.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 66.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 38.5% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 33% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Kiki Bertens and Irina Camelia Begu face off in the Round of 16 at Madrid on Clay.
Kiki Bertens leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Kiki Bertens is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marketa Vondrousova (Jul 24).
Irina Camelia Begu is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Karolina Muchova (Jun 24).
Share this match
